Mandal Commission

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Mandal Commission-

Background To The Issue Of Backward Classes

  • Endeavors to reinforce some adaptation of positive movement for India’s “untouchables” and discouraged directions began in the scope of parts of British India for the span of the nineteenth hundred years. After India developed to be free in 1947 B. R. Ambedkar, a representative for India’s “untouchables” and a draftsman of India’s Constitution, made positive that the Constitution nullified “distance” and outfitted political and monetary advantages for “booked standings” and “planned clans.” India’s Constitution also authorized the state to make uncommon arrangements “for the improvement of any socially and instructively in reverse preparation of residents.”
Background to the issue of Backward Classes--
  • Starting around 1936, decent records (“plans”) had existed of India’s stations and clans that involved a “debased position in the Hindu social plan.” However, no genuine records existed of India’s “regressive classes,” that is, awful or in some other cases distraught organizations that did now not possess a “corrupted position in the Hindu social plan.” To address this inadequacy, on 29 January 1953 the leader of India designated India’s most memorable Backward Classes Commission underneath Chairman Kaka Kalelkar.
  •  On 31 March 1955, the Kalelkar Commission presented its report, for example, a posting of 2,399 “in reverse” gatherings, 837 of which were seen “generally in reverse,” the use of standing as the chief proof of backwardness. The local government, expecting that the report’s “station test” would expand the last appearance of a casteless, raunchy society in India, dismissed the ideas of the Kalelkar Commission. From that point until 1977, when the Janata Party accepted India’s public decisions, the issue of choosing cross country guidelines for “in reverse classes” remained practically lethargic

Mandal Commission

  • On January 1, 1979, the Morarji Desai authorities choose Bindeshwari Prasad Mandal, a former chief minister of Bihar, to head the Second Backward Class Commission. Mandal submitted his file two years later, on December 31, 1980. By then, the Morarji Desai authorities had fallen and Indira Gandhi obtained proper right here to power. It remained in deep freeze for the duration of her time length and that of Rajiv Gandhi. Finally, in the 12 months of 1990, V.P. Singh decided to pressure the Mandal file’s tips in employment sectors.

Criticism Of Mandal Commission

  • However, his announcement led to big protests in the route of the country. The document used to be as soon as criticized usually for the use of the 1931 census and making caste a standard for reservation. Many college university college students took to the streets, retaining dharnas and blockading off roads. These most fulfilling in anti-Mandal protests, which took a disagreeable flip in September 1990 when a Delhi University student from Deshbandhu College, Rajeev Goswami, self-immolated. Goswami grew to come to be the face of the anti-Mandal action at that point. But there was once as soon as moreover every unique faction which applauded the record and organized pro- Mandal protests, which included leaders like Lalu Prasad Yadav, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Ram Vilas Paswan, and Mayawati.

Procedure And Reccomendation

  • The Mandal Commission developed eleven warning signs of social, educational, and monetary backwardness. One indicator was once being regarded backward by different castes or classes. Other indications covered depending commonly on guide labor for livelihood and having a common value of the family property at least 25 percent under the national average. In addition to figuring out backward training amongst Hindus, the Mandal Commission identified backward lessons among non-Hindus (e.g., Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and Buddhists) if they had belonged to “untouchable” castes earlier than they converted to a non-Hindu religion, or if Hindu castes with the same occupational names, such as dhobi (launderer), Lohar (ironworker), nai (barber), or teli (oil presser), have been viewed backward.
  • In February 1980 the Mandal Commission carried out a nationwide socioeconomic discipline survey in which it gathered interview data from two villages and one city block in 405 of the nation’s 406 districts. The area survey data, mixed with facts from the 1961 census, quite a number of states’ lists of their backward classes, and personal information of Commission individuals and others, enabled the Mandal Commission to generate an all-India “other backward classes” (OBC) list of 3,743 castes and a more-underprivileged “depressed backward classes” listing of 2,108 castes.
  • The Mandal Commission concluded that India’s populace consisted of about 16% non-Hindus, 17.5 % Brahmans and “forward castes,44% other backward classes,” and 22.5 percent scheduled castes and tribes. However, on account that the 16 percent non-Hindus presumably blanketed approximately the equal proportion of “other backward classes” as did the Hindus (i.e., any other 8%), the whole share of “other backward classes” (Hindu and non-Hindu) came to fifty-two percentage (44% + 8%) of India’s population.
  • The Mandal Commission would have recommended that 52 percent of central government posts be reserved for OBCs. However, the Supreme Court had already ruled that the whole proportion of reservations below Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution ought to be below 50 percent. Since the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes already accounted for 22.5 percentage of India’s population, only a little greater than 27 percent of government posts should be reserved for backward training barring exceeding the below-50 percent limit.

  • The Mandal Commission consequently endorsed that 27 percent of central and national government jobs need to be reserved for OBCs and that the 27 percentage determine have to be utilized for other “compensatory discrimination” or “compensatory protection” benefits, along with those provided by means of universities and affiliated colleges.

Issue In Mandal Commission

  • On 7 August 1990 Prime Minister V. P. Singh, of the National Front coalition, introduced to Parliament that he would put into effect the Mandal Commission’s recommendations. Violent objections ensued, in particular in northern India among the upper castes, who feared the commission’s pointers would reduce their access to greater education. Southern Indian responses to Prime Minister Singh’s announcement had been notably milder. In various southern states, the proportions of backward classes combined with scheduled castes and scheduled tribes had already approached 50 percent prior to the Mandal Commission’s recommendations.

Court Order Regarding Issue On Mandal Commission

  • On sixteen November 1992, the Supreme Court upheld the Mandal Commission’s 27 percent quota for backward classes, as nicely as the precept that the combined scheduled-caste, scheduled-tribe, and backward-class beneficiaries have to not exceed 50 percent of India’s population. The Supreme Court additionally ruled that “caste” ought to be used to identify “backward classes” in circumstances the caste was socially backward as a whole, and that the “creamy layer” of the backward instructions ought to now not get hold of backward-class benefits. The “creamy layer” blanketed children of constitutional workplace holders, classification I and class II officers, professionals, owners of giant agricultural farms, and those with annual incomes of over 100,000 rupees. In September 1993 Prime Minister Narasimha Rao, of the Congress Party, announced that he was organized to put into effect the Mandal Commission recommendations. This time there was little public resistance.

Indira Sawhney Case

Indira Sawhney Case-

Indra Sawhney V. Union of India: The Mandal case

  • This was once the case made towards VP Singh’s execution of the Mandal Commission’s recommendations. It was once heard earlier than a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court, which dominated that the Union Government’s layout to reserve 27% of authorities’ employment for backward instructions is legally acceptable, furnished that socially superior people, which includes the creamy layer, are removed. However, some prerequisites had to be followed, such as bookings need to be constrained to unique appointments and now not promotions, and complete reservations must now not surpass 50%. As a result, the courtroom in part upheld the two impugned notifications (OM) dated August 13, 1990, and September 25, 1991, as legitimate and enforceable, situation to the stipulations set forth in the decision, which encompass the exclusion of socially superior persons—the creamy layer of the backward classes. However, the court docket invalidated Congress’s OM reserving 10% of authorities’ employment for economically deprived agencies amongst the top classes.

  • Thus, we ought to see that the over attaining insurance policies have been eliminated and an environment-friendly coverage was once installed from the Mandal Commission Report by way of the SC’s choice:

The Case Led To Positive Amendments

1. 77th Amendment- Article 16(4-A)

According to clause 4-A, nothing in this Article shall forestall the nation from making any provision for reservation in things of merchandising to any classification or training of posts in the provider of the nation in favor of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes which in the opinion of the State, are now not safely represented in the offerings below the State.

2. 81st Amendment- 16(4-B)

Clause 4-B seeks to give up the 50% ceiling on the reservation for SCs/STs and BCs in backlog vacancies which ought to no longer be stuffed up in the preceding years due to the non-availability of eligible candidates.

3. 85th Amendment Act

It replaces the phrases “in things of merchandising to any class” in clause 4- A of Article sixteen with phrases “in things of promotion, with consequential seniority, to any class.”

Reservation Underneath The Indian Constitution

  • After appreciation what is reservation coverage and its want we will seem to be at its provision current beneath the charter to defend against such discriminatory practices?

  • Part XVI- involved with the reservation of seats in the Central and State legislatures for SC and ST.

  • Articles 15(4) and 16(4)- Empowers kingdom and central governments to reserve seats in authorities offerings for participants of the SC and ST.

  • Article 16(4)- approves the authorities to provide reservation in promoting and in addition consequential seniority to SC and ST candidates accelerated by means of a reservation. [Inserted by means of the Constitution (77th Amendment) Act, 1995 and modified by means of Constitution (85th Amendment) Act, 200]

  • Article sixteen (4 B)- Allowing the country to exchange empty positions reserved for SCs/STs in the following year, as a consequence nullifying the fifty percent reservation cap on whole vacancies for that year. [introduced by way of the 81st Amendment Act of 2000]

  • Articles 330 and 332- Provide different illustrations for SCs and STs in Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies, respectively.

  • Article 243D- Permits for the reservation of seats in all Panchayats for SCs and STs.

  • Article 233T- For the reservation of seats in all municipalities for SCs and STs.

  • Article 335- provision to enable the needs of SCs and STs to be viewed persistently to make sure the administration’s effectiveness.

  • Article 17- Abolition of untouchability and proclaims its exercise in any shape to be an offense punishable underneath the law.

  • Article 39-A – Implementation of equal justice and free criminal useful resource to Economically Backward Classes

  • Article 45- Duty on the country to increase the requirements of dwelling and fitness of backward classes.

Latest Constitution (105th Amendment) Act, 2021?

Latest Constitution (105th Amendment) Act, 2021-
  • Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Virendra Kumar delivered the Constitution (127th Amendment) Bill, 2021 in the Lok Sabha to fix the states’ energy to make their own OBC lists. A few days later, the invoice received the president’s assent and, hence, came the Constitution (One Hundred and Fifth Amendment) Act, 2021.

  • It got here after a bench of 5 Supreme Court judges unanimously declared Maratha reservation, exceeding the limit of 50%, as unconstitutional. Most importantly, the Court declined to revisit its 1992 Indira Sawhney judgment, which constantly the reservation restriction at 50%.

  • However, the hassle arose in the 2nd section of the judgment, on the validity of the 102nd Constitution Amendment Act of 2018 which delivered the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), that interfered with the authority of State Legislatures to furnish gain to the social and educationally backward communities in their very own jurisdiction.

  • The Constitution Amendment Act had additionally brought Articles 338B and 342A in the Constitution. Article 338B offers the newly installed NCBC comparable to articles 338 and 338A. Whereas, article 342A empowers the President to specify the socially and educationally backward communities (SEBC) in a State. It further says that it is for the Parliament to include or cut out a community in the Central List to providing of reservation benefits, which eventually strips the states off their rights to make or amend the OBCs list. Later, this go was once challenged in the courtroom which in the end paved the way for the Constitution (105th Amendment) Act, 2021.


  • We have viewed how the Mandal Commission Report was once drafted and with the aid of comprehending the scenario and the important points of the reservation regime, we can conclude that the Mandal Commission Report was once a critical step in developing India’s reservation policy. It resulted in giant modifications to reservation policy, by using growing the share of humans who benefited from it. It definitely brought about issues for the ordinary population, as their opportunities were diminished, however, the reservation policy used to be essential to uplift disadvantaged residents out of the vicious cycle of poverty and discrimination. Numerous amendments and policies have been added following the Mandal Commission’s Report. Though the file used is no longer perfect, it was once extensively extended after it used to be challenged in the Indira Sawhney case, and a very recommended reservation coverage for OBCs in central authorities services began in 1992. Moreover, no Union administration has made any big efforts toward implementing the Mandal Commission’s endorsed structural changes. Agriculture, the rural economy’s bedrock, has to grow to be economically unviable. So after the implementation of the reservation policy, some vital essence of the suggestion desires to be introduced for an extra positive result.

Top 13 Interesting Facts About Mandal Commission

  1. The primary objective that the Mandal Commission had in India was to identify the conditions regarding social and educationally backward classes to consider the question of reservations of seats and quotas.

  2. Recommendations of the Mandal Commission:-

  • Land reforms to improve the conditions of the OBCs.

  • Reservation for OBCs in the Government jobs and the educational institution.

  1. Mandal, who was once the Bihar chief minister.

  2. Indira Sawhney Case was popularly known as Mandal Commission.

  3. Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Commission headed by B.P. Mandal.

  4. In 1990, the Central cabinet decided to implement the recommendations of the Mandal Commission.

  5. The British Raj introduced elements of reservation in the Government of India Act of 1909 and there were many other measures put in place prior to independence.

  6. A Mandal is a local government area, similar to a tehsil, in parts of India.

  7. Chief Minister D. Devaraj Urs of Karnataka appointed the first Backward Classes Commission under the Chairmanship of L.G. Havanur in 1975.

  8. 1931 census data to calculate the number of OBCs.

  9. In Bengal, the Mondal surname is found among Baishya Saha, Gandhabanik, Kayastha, Mahishya, Rajbanshi, Sadgop, Subarna Banik, Tili, Ugra Kshatriya, and among the Scheduled Castes.

  10. The Mundle surname is one of the names that came to Britain with the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. The name was de Mandeville or de Mandeville and derives from a place in Normandy.

  11. The Mandal Commission, therefore, recommended that 27 percent of central and state government jobs should be reserved for OBCs.

Mandal Commission-

For deep details, you can read the full article. Click the link below :

Ricky Anand- 13angle writer

Ricky Anand



0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x